
So there's a rumor that Marvel Studios is going to try to make a Venom movie. You know, the big bag of goo that Topher Grace became at the end of Spider-Man 3. At least that's what IESB is saying.
IESB is also heaping a lot more praise onto the character of Venom and a lot more derision onto Spider-Man 3 than either of them deserve. Lots of comic nerds love Venom, and they tend to overlook the fact that the character in the comics is essentially an Alien riff, all drooling ridiculous tongue and a head full of teeth threatening to eat your brain. It was an unfortunate symptom of a lot of the early-1990s awfulness that pervaded the medium at the time. His origin is ridiculously convoluted, and I think Sam Raimi did the best he could with it. Seriously, there were about thirty characters with absurd prehensile tongues and fang-filled mouths like this. Thankfully, they left the tongue out of the movie.
Raimi likely had to cave from the pressure Avi Arad was putting on him to shoehorn Venom into Spider-Man 3, when the original villains were going to be the Sandman and the Vulture (a character Ben Kingsley was in talks to play at one time, which makes me all the angrier that we got Venom instead). Venom in his own movie would hopefully free up Raimi to get back to the business of making classic Spider-Man movies (although I really hope he amps up Spidey's dialog at some point, because the character is supposed to be a really funny guy). My kingdom for Mysterio, the crazy fish-bowl-headed hallucinogenic criminal.
No word on whether Topher Grace would return for the role. I really thought his prying to God to kill Peter Parker was a great broken moment. But the gooey black symbiote can really be on just about anybody, so there's no limit to who they can bring in for this movie. Maybe even Tim Conway.

Comments (4)
I hadn't thought that Raimi had made a call one way or the other on coming back? I'd gotten the impression that he was leaning more toward no than yes on that one...
Posted by Katrina | February 6, 2008 8:44 PM
Posted on February 6, 2008 20:44
Frankly Spiderman 3 Blew chunks! I'm no fan of Venom and would much rather have seen more character development of the Sandman! The Vulture would indeed have been a more welcome villan if they honestly needed three, which I don't think they did. Too many villans and not enough airtime! That's what hurt Spiderman 3. That and Tobey Maguire's disco villany!
Posted by Steve | February 7, 2008 7:14 AM
Posted on February 7, 2008 07:14
I enjoyed the disco villainy, because finally, finally, Peter Parker was a funny guy.
Posted by FancastAndy | February 7, 2008 12:43 PM
Posted on February 7, 2008 12:43
venom is my favorite supervillan and i thought he was decent in spiderman 3 the only thing that really through me off was... how come they chose topher grace as eddie brock? seriously how gay. eddie brock was suppose to lift around 750 lbs in human form and topher looks like he would have trouble lifting 20. not a good casting role.
but overall spiderman 3 was good. spiderman 4 would be cool if it had vulture, lizard and carnage.
venom spinoff movie would be kinda cool too. id see it.
Posted by danny | July 23, 2008 2:52 PM
Posted on July 23, 2008 14:52